This resource was written and reviewed by experts. Learn more about how we produce science you can trust.
a creative red and black duotone image of onions

UGA Extension contacts:
Jason Lessl, Daniel L. Jackson, Christopher Todd Tyson, Jason D. Edenfield, Ross Greene, Aubrey Shirley, Derrick Bowen, Denny R. Thigpen, Steven Powell, Savannah Tanner, and Daniel Clark

Each season the University of Georgia, Agricultural and Environmental Services Laboratories (AESL) evaluates the flavor-associated compounds in the short-day onions grown in the variety trial. These onion varieties are submitted by the participating seed companies, grown at the Vidalia Onion and Vegetable Research Center (VOVRC), and once they are harvested and dried, they are submitted to the AESL for analysis of the pungency-related compounds: pyruvic acid, lachrymatory factor (LF), and methyl thiosulfinates.

Due to the association of Vidalia onions with low pungency and sweet flavor, this annual evaluation provides useful information about the relative flavor quality of these onion varieties. Furthermore, results are used to evaluate yellow Granex varieties before officially qualifying them to be grown as sweet Vidalia onions in the region.

This publication summarizes the flavor analysis results from the 2021–2022 growing season, as well as compares the performance of each variety over the past three growing seasons.

Materials and Methods

There were 53 onion varieties analyzed as part of the 2021–2022 variety trial. Each variety was grown at the VOVRC in quadruplicate plots. Harvested onions from each plot were dried and submitted to the lab individually. Cores taken from 10 onions within each replicate were composited and pressed to collect the onion juice, analyzed following procedures described in Kim et al. (2017).

Results and Discussion

The following tables compare the concentrations of flavor-associated compounds in onions grown as a part of the 2021–2022 variety trial. It should be noted that as the three measured parameters decrease, the onions are considered to have a more superior flavor quality.

In this year’s trials, the pyruvic acid (pungency) content ranged from 3.7–7.4 µmol/ml, which is an increase of 32% compared to the past two growing seasons. Lachrymatory factor ranged from 2.9–6.7 µmol/ml, which was an increase of 43% compared to past two seasons.

Finally, methyl thiosulfinates ranged from 8.0–42 nmol/ml, which was a slight increase of 8% compared with the past two growing season. Overall, the pungency of the variety trial onions was approximately 30% higher as compared to the past two seasons. This could be attributed to the hotter, drier growing season.

The cumulative variety flavor quality rankings are also provided below for this year’s data along with the average rating of yellow Granex onion varieties grown over the past three seasons. For additional information regarding the performance of a given variety, please contact your Extension agent or the Vidalia Onion and Vegetable Research Center. We would like to thank the participating seed companies as well as the Vidalia Onion Committee for their support of this trial.

Reference

Kim, H.-Y., Jackson, D., Adhikari, K., Riner, C., & Sanchez-Brambila, G. (2017). Relationship between consumer acceptability and pungency-related flavor compounds of Vidalia onions. Journal of Food Science, 82(10), 2396–2402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13915

Tables

Table 1. Pungency (Pyruvic Acid) Content in Onions in the 2021–2022 Variety Trial.
VarietyPyruvic acid
µmole/g
New Frontier3.8a
Candy Kim4.0ab
Vidora4.2abc
WI-1294.3abc
Plethora4.5abcd
Sweet Magnolia4.5abcd
White Phantom4.6abcde
Sivan4.6abcde
Sweet Agent4.7abcde
Candy Joy4.7abcde
Red Sensation4.7abcde
Sweet Azalea4.8abcde
GA Boy4.8abcde
Sofire4.9abcde
Fast Track5.0abcde
Vulkana5.0abcde
DP 14075.0abcde
NUN 59015.1abcdef
Macon5.1abcdef
Maragogi5.2abcdef
Alison5.2abcdefg
Quick Start5.2abcdefg
Dulciana5.2abcdefg
Candy Ann5.3abcdefg
White Gaspare5.3abcdefg
OSYF12-70915.3abcdefg
Superex5.3abcdefg
OSYF10-40215.4abcdefg
3695.4abcdefg
Chianti5.4abcdefg
Red Marvel5.4abcdefg
Pirate5.4abcdefg
Early Sweet5.4abcdefg
4045.5abcdefg
EMY 554575.6abcdefg
EMY 554555.6abcdefg
NUN 10115.6abcdefg
EMY 551265.7abcdefg
Rio Dulce5.7abcdefg
Alba Blanca5.8abcdefg
Tania5.9bcdefg
Century5.9bcdefg
Rio Del Sol6.0bcdefg
A12986.1bcdefg
PRR6.2cdefg
Mata Hari6.2cdefg
Red Maiden6.3cdefg
Timon6.4defg
Lucille6.5defg
Sapelo6.6efg
EMY 558437.2fg
Joelino7.4g
Note. Similar letters between varieties indicate those varieties are not significantly different according to Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 2. Onion Lachrymatory Factor (Propanethial S-Oxide) Content in the 2021–2022 Variety Trial.
VarietyLachrymatory factor
µmole/g
Candy Kim2.9a
Plethora3.1ab
Red Marvel3.3abc
Sweet Magnolia3.3abc
Sivan3.3abc
Sweet Azalea3.6abcd
Chianti3.6abcde
Red Sensation3.6abcde
Rio Dulce3.7abcdef
New Frontier3.9abcdef
Superex3.9abcdef
Sweet Agent3.9abcdef
Candy Joy3.9abcdef
Rio Del Sol4.0abcdef
Century4.1abcdefg
Macon4.1abcdefg
Maragogi4.3abcdefg
White Gaspare4.3abcdefg
White Phantom4.3abcdefg
Sapelo4.3abcdefg
NUN 59014.4abcdefg
Quick Start4.4abcdefg
Fast Track4.4abcdefg
Candy Ann4.4abcdefg
Sofire4.6abcdefg
DP 14074.6abcdefg
OSYF10-40214.6abcdefg
Vidora4.6abcdefg
Timon4.7abcdefg
Vulkana4.9abcdefg
PRR4.9abcdefg
EMY 551265.0abcdefg
Early Sweet5.0abcdefg
NUN 10115.1abcdefg
Dulciana5.2abcdefg
Mata Hari5.2abcdefg
EMY 554555.2abcdefg
Alba Blanca5.2abcdefg
OSYF12-70915.2abcdefg
A12985.3abcdefg
Tania5.4abcdefg
Alison5.4abcdefg
WI-1295.6bcdefg
4045.7cdefg
EMY 554576.1defg
3696.1defg
Joelino6.2defg
GA Boy6.2defg
Pirate6.3efg
EMY 558436.5fg
Red Maiden6.7g
Lucille6.8g
Note. Similar letters between varieties indicate those varieties are not significantly different according to Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 3. Methyl Thiosulfinate Content in Onions in the 2021–2022 Variety Trial.
VarietyMethyl thiosulfinates
nmole/g
EMY 554577.8a
EMY 554558.8ab
Century9.0ab
Sweet Azalea9.2ab
3699.9ab
PRR11.2abc
Red Sensation11.5abc
Plethora11.6abc
Tania11.9abc
Sweet Magnolia12.9abcd
EMY 5512613.3abcd
Dulciana13.5abcd
Alison14.0abcd
Maragogi14.3abcd
A129814.5abcd
NUN 590114.6abcd
Red Marvel14.9abcd
Sivan15.3abcd
Red Maiden15.9abcde
Superex16.2abcde
Macon18.1abcdef
EMY 5584319.7abcdef
WI-12919.7abcdef
Rio Del Sol20.1abcdef
Sweet Agent21.3abcdefg
GA Boy22.1abcdefg
Rio Dulce22.4abcdefg
Pirate22.8abcdefg
White Gaspare22.9abcdefg
NUN 101123.5abcdefg
Alba Blanca23.8abcdefg
Timon24.6abcdefg
Mata Hari25.4abcdefg
Lucille25.8abcdefg
Vulkana26.7abcdefg
White Phantom27.1abcdefg
OSYF10-402128.7abcdefg
New Frontier29.8bcdefg
Fast Track30.2bcdefg
Vidora30.5bcdefg
Sofire30.5bcdefg
DP 140730.9bcdefg
Candy Kim31.2bcdefg
Joelino31.8bcdefg
Sapelo33.4cdefg
OSYF12-709134.5defg
Chianti35.3defg
Quick Start37.4efg
Early Sweet38.0efg
40438.4efg
Candy Joy41.3fg
Candy Ann42.2g
Note. Similar letters between varieties indicate those varieties are not significantly different according to Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 4. Overall Flavor Quality Ranking of the 2021–2022 Variety Trials.
VarietyRank
Plethora1
Candy Kim2(t)
Sweet Azalea2(t)
Sivan4(t)
Sweet Magnolia4(t)
Red Sensation6
Red Marvel7
New Frontier8
Emy 554559
Century10(t)
Maragogi10(t)
Vidora10(t)
Alison13(t)
Dulciana13(t)
Emy 5512613(t)
Emy 5545713(t)
Nunhems 590113(t)
Superex13(t)
Sweet Agent13(t)
Tania13(t)
WI-12913(t)
36922(t)
Macon22(t)
PRR22(t)
Sofire22(t)
Vulkana22(t)
White Phantom22(t)
A129828(t)
DP 140728(t)
Fast Track28(t)
Rio Del Sol28(t)
Rio Dulce28(t)
Alba Blanca33(t)
Chianti33(t)
Nunhems 101133(t)
OSYF10-402133(t)
White Gaspare33(t)
Georgia Boy38
Candy Joy39(t)
Mata Hari39(t)
OSYF12-709141(t)
Timon41(t)
Early Sweet43(t)
Pirate43(t)
Quick Start43(t)
40446
Candy Ann47(t)
Red Maiden47(t)
Sapelo47(t)
Lucille50
Emy 5584351(t)
Joelino51(t)
(t) tied
Table 5. Overall Flavor Quality Ranking of Yellow Variety Trial Onions Harvested in 2021–2022.
VarietyRank
Sweet Magnolia1
Sweet Azalea2
Plethora3
Emy 554574
Century5
Superex6
Alison7
Sweet Agent8(t)
Vidora8(t)
Macon10
Emy 5512611
Emy 5545512
Georgia Boy13(t)
New Frontier13(t)
WI-12913(t)
PRR16
Candy Kim17(t)
Tania17(t)
Pirate19
Candy Joy20
Fast Track21
Candy Ann22
Quick Start23
Sapelo24
(t) tied

Published by University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. For more information or guidance, contact your local Extension office.

The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (working cooperatively with Fort Valley State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the counties of Georgia) offers its educational programs, assistance, and materials to all people without regard to age, color, disability, genetic information, national origin, race, religion, sex, or veteran status, and is an Equal Opportunity Institution.

Share

What is a Annual Publication?

An annual Extension publication provides timely, research-based information that is updated annually, such as spray guides for commercial fruit growers, or reports about UGA research trials on turfgrass, vegetables, and more.

Written and Reviewed by Experts

This resource was written and reviewed by experts. Click below for more information on how we produce science you can trust.