This resource was written and reviewed by experts. Learn more about how we produce science you can trust.
a creative red and black duotone image of onions

UGA Extension contacts:
Juan Carlos Diaz-Perez and Christopher Todd Tyson

This study aimed to determine the effect of biodegradable mulch on Vidalia onion bulb yield in three sweet onion cultivars.

Material and Methods

The experiment was conducted at the University of Georgia Vidalia Onion and Vegetable Research Center near Reidsville, GA, and at the Horticulture Farm on UGA’s Tifton campus in the winter of 2021–2022. Two weeks before planting, the soil received the equivalent of 150 lb/acre of nitrogen (N) from chicken manure. Onion seedlings were transplanted on Dec. 16, 2021.

Plants were grown on beds (6 ft center to center) with four rows (7 in. apart) and an in-row plant spacing of 5 in. Beds were uncovered or covered with film mulch. There were two lines of drip tape per bed. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications. There were nine treatment combinations (three mulches with three cultivars).

Mulch treatments were black plastic mulch, biodegradable mulch, and bare soil. The cultivars evaluated were ‘Candy Joy’, ‘Macon’, and ‘Vidora’.

Plants were harvested when about 30% of the plant necks had collapsed (tops down). Onions were graded into marketable and unmarketable according to USDA grading standards. The bulb numbers and weights were recorded. After grading, a subsample of 10 marketable bulbs per replication was used to determine soluble solids content (SSC), dry matter content, and pungency (measured as pyruvate concentration). Total phenols were determined to measure antioxidant capacity (expressed as gallic acid equivalents.

Results

Location

Marketable and total-bulb number and yields, percentage of marketable bulbs, and bulb weight were higher in Reidsville than in Tifton, while cull yield was higher in Tifton than in Reidsville (Table 1).

The incidence of doubles was higher in Reidsville than in Tifton, while sour-skin incidence was the highest in Tifton. Leaf N was higher, while phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) were lower in Tifton than in Reidsville (Table 2). Bulb SSC, total phenols, and pungency were higher in Reidsville than in Tifton (Table 3).

Mulch

Plastic mulch had the highest weed control, followed by biodegradable mulch. Marketable yield, total yield, and individual bulb weight were highest on plastic mulch and lowest in bare soil (Table 1). Cull yield and the incidence of bulb sour skin were the highest on plastic mulch. Leaf nutrients were unaffected by mulch treatments, except for manganese (Mn), which was reduced in bare soil (Table 2). Bulb SSC was the highest on biodegradable mulch and the lowest on plastic mulch (Table 3).

Cultivar

Marketable yield was highest in ‘Macon’ and lowest in ‘Candy Joy’ (Table 1). There were no leaf nutrient differences among cultivars (Table 2). Bulb SSC was highest in ‘Macon’ and lowest in ‘Vidora’, while the dry matter was lowest in ‘Macon’ (Table 3). ‘Macon’ also had the highest total phenols and pungency.

Table 1. Bulb Onion Yields as Influenced by Mulch and Cultivar. Data from Tifton and Reidsville, GA, winter of 2021–2022.
VariablesMarketableBulb weight
(lb)
TotalCullDoubles
(%)
Sour skin
(%)
Bulb No.
(bulb/acre)
Yield
(lb/acre)
(%)Bulb No.
(bulb/acre)
Yield
(lb/acre)
Bulb No.
(bulb/acre)
Yield
(lb/acre)
Location
Tifton30295 bz18978 b54 b0.54 b54872 b23817 b24578 a4839 a0.22 b3.5 a
Reidsville57907 a44556 a85 a0.76 a68588 a46391 a10681 b1835 b0.43 a1.5 b
Mulch
Bare soil37937 b24242 c62 b0.55 c57869 c26664 c199322421 b0.310.6 b
Biodegradable45173 a32238 b73 a0.66 b61361 b34973 b161882736 b0.201.7 b
Plastic48813 a38573 a73 a0.73 a65847 a43558 a170344986 a0.455.3 a
Cultivar
Candy Joy36088 b16985 c55 b0.41 c62155 ab20503 c26067 a35190.84 a0.1 b
Macon49596 a44648 a76 a0.86 a63559 a48346 a13964 b36980.03 b4.2 a
Vidora45709 a32520 b76 a0.67 b59290 b35385 b13499 b28650.11 b3.1 a
Significance
Location (L)< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.00010.0410.028
Mulch (M)0.0005< 0.00010.010< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.00010.2530.0100.1030.0003
LxM0.1640.3630.1080.5730.1560.7290.4570.1390.8370.109
Cultivar (C)0.0002< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.00010.020< 0.0001< 0.00010.587< 0.00010.002
LxC0.3060.0930.0950.7320.8070.4080.3120.0140.0030.011
MxC0.4380.7350.6470.3790.1470.4670.9400.6430.0610.065
LxMxC0.9840.8300.5720.6590.4260.9150.5360.3120.7750.159
z Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different based on Fisher’s protected least significant difference test at 95% confidence.
Table 2. Leaf Mineral Nutrients as Influenced by Mulch and Cultivar. Data from Tifton and Reidsville, GA, winter of 2021–2022.
VariablesNPKCaMgSBCuFeMnZn
Location
Tifton1.85 az0.16 b1.76 b0.75 b0.130.20 b9.5 b3.4 b1046159 a44.4 a
Reidsville1.60 b0.31 a2.34 a0.87 a0.130.23 a14.7 a72.0 a116676 b18.6 b
Mulch
Bare soil1.670.231.900.820.130.19 b11.734.0104186 b27.8
Biodegradable1.680.252.140.800.130.22 a12.438.61172135 a33.2
Plastic1.830.232.110.810.130.23 a12.240.51104132 a33.4
Cultivar
Candy Joy1.740.22 b1.990.850.140.2211.4 b35.199411432.5
Macon1.710.25 a2.130.760.130.2113.0 a40.0115112433.1
Vidora1.730.23 b2.030.820.130.2111.9 b38.0117211428.8
Significance
Location (L)0.006< 0.0001< 0.00010.0010.3730.008< 0.0001< 0.00010.229< 0.0001< 0.0001
Mulch (M)0.2190.2340.0530.8920.9430.0010.4310.1180.5560.0010.065
LxM0.1760.4520.1020.9960.7630.0100.9510.1260.6640.0060.163
Cultivar (C)0.9730.0430.3520.0910.2140.4820.0120.2940.2810.6900.223
LxC0.2730.7530.1760.3760.2870.1940.2250.2820.9370.8460.313
MxC0.8640.8440.9690.4260.5700.8130.5390.7380.7570.5650.816
LxMxC0.7900.6970.9720.5420.8680.9760.7860.7310.2570.6520.780
z Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different based on Fisher’s protected least significant difference test at 95% confidence.
Table 3. Quality of Sweet Onion as Influenced by Mulch and Cultivar. Data from Tifton and Reidsville, GA, winter of 2021–2022.
VariablesSSC (%)Dry matter
(%)
Total phenols
(gallic acid equiv.mg·L-1)
Pyruvate
(µM)
Location
Tifton8.8 bz11.6286 b1.20 b
Reidsville8.9 a12.1529 a1.88 a
Mulch
Bare soil8.9 b12.04141.57
Biodegradable9.1 a11.84031.55
Plastic8.6 c11.73991.48
Cultivar
Candy Joy9.1 b12.2 a331 c1.24 b
Macon9.5 a10.8 b464 a1.99 a
Vidora7.9 c12.5 a419 b1.36 b
Significance
Location (L)0.0500.091< 0.0001< 0.0001
Mulch (M)< 0.00010.5530.2310.611
LxM0.0920.9120.8720.001
Cultivar (C)< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001
LxC< 0.00010.5740.0500.006
MxC< 0.00010.1720.7250.019
LxMxC< 0.00010.0640.6610.016
z Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different based on Fisher’s protected least significant difference test at 95% confidence.

Conclusion

Marketable and total yields and bulb size were the highest on plastic mulch. Onion yield was the highest on plastic mulch. Plants on biodegradable mulch had higher yields and lower weed pressure than those in bare soil. The reduced weed pressure in the plastic mulch plots may partially explain the enhanced bulb yields. Among cultivars, marketable bulb yields were the highest in ‘Macon’ and the lowest in ‘Candy Joy’.


Published by University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. For more information or guidance, contact your local Extension office.

The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (working cooperatively with Fort Valley State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the counties of Georgia) offers its educational programs, assistance, and materials to all people without regard to age, color, disability, genetic information, national origin, race, religion, sex, or veteran status, and is an Equal Opportunity Institution.

Share

What is a Annual Publication?

An annual Extension publication provides timely, research-based information that is updated annually, such as spray guides for commercial fruit growers, or reports about UGA research trials on turfgrass, vegetables, and more.

Written and Reviewed by Experts

This resource was written and reviewed by experts. Click below for more information on how we produce science you can trust.