This resource was written and reviewed by experts. Learn more about how we produce science you can trust.
Turf samples

The University of Georgia (UGA) turfgrass breeding program develops improved cool- and warm-season turfgrass cultivars adapted to the environmental conditions and management challenges of the southeastern U.S. Breeding objectives focus on improving turf quality, persistence, environmental adaptation, and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses while meeting the evolving needs of golf courses, sports fields, home lawns, sod producers, and landscape managers.

Research activities encompass a diverse collection of turfgrass species, including seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum), zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp.), bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.), centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), and fine fescues (Festuca spp.).

Together, these breeding efforts aim to develop superior cultivars capable of maintaining performance under increasingly challenging environmental and management conditions.

Seashore Paspalum

The seashore paspalum breeding program at UGA has played a leading role in the development and commercialization of improved seashore paspalum cultivars for golf course, sports field, and landscape applications. Our seashore paspalum program has announced the development of three new cultivars that are likely to have a major impact on the global turfgrass industry over the next few years.

In 2023, UGA released ‘SeaScape’ seashore paspalum, a vegetatively propagated conventional cultivar suitable for course-wide use on golf courses and on athletic fields, home lawns, and other recreation venues. Our breeding program developed the first non-GMO herbicide resistance system for seashore paspalum and branded it as ACCeTM technology.

ACCeTM technology utilizes a mutation conferring high levels of crop tolerance to several ACCase-inhibiting herbicides and provides greatly enhanced control options for weedy grasses such as bermudagrass in seashore paspalum. Utilizing our germplasm with this technology, Pure Seed Testing has recently released ‘Stratis’ with ACCeTM, an exciting new herbicide-resistant seeded paspalum marketed by Atlas Turf International. In addition, UGA developed a new vegetatively propagated cultivar with ACCeTM technology and released it in 2025. It will be marketed under the name of ‘SeaLect’ when it becomes commercially available in 2027.

Current breeding efforts focus on evaluating advanced experimental germplasm and identifying superior selections with enhanced turf quality, stress tolerance, establishment characteristics, and overall adaptation. Ongoing research seeks to expand the utility of seashore paspalum through the development of cultivars with enhanced weed control options and the capability of meeting the evolving needs of turfgrass managers while maintaining the exceptional salinity tolerance and environmental adaptability that have made seashore paspalum an increasingly important turfgrass species throughout the southeastern U.S. and beyond.

Zoysiagrass

Zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp.) is one of the most adaptable warm-season turfgrasses and is valued for its drought tolerance, shade tolerance, salinity tolerance, dense canopy, low mowing requirement, and reduced fertilizer and pesticide needs. These characteristics make zoysiagrass a strong candidate for home lawns, roadsides, parks, and other low-input turf systems. Despite these advantages, broader adoption has been limited by the cost and logistics of vegetative establishment and by the limited availability of seeded cultivars. At present, ‘Zenith’ and ‘Compadre’ are the primary commercial zoysiagrass cultivars available in seed form in the United States.

Seed-propagated zoysiagrass could provide a lower-cost and more easily distributed alternative to sod, plugs, or sprigs. However, inconsistent seed production and poor seed germination continue to restrict the development and adoption of seeded zoysiagrass.

Seed dormancy has long been recognized as a major barrier to reliable establishment, and previous studies have shown that germination may be improved through physical, chemical, or physiological seed treatments. However, treatment responses have been inconsistent, and relatively few studies have evaluated emergence across diverse zoysiagrass germplasm or determined whether treatment effects are dependent on genotype.

Understanding genotypic variation in seedling emergence is important for both cultivar development and practical turf establishment. Germplasm with rapid and sustained emergence may provide useful sources of reduced dormancy and improved seed-based establishment, while genotype-specific treatment responses may help determine whether chemical treatments such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH) consistently improve emergence or benefit only selected germplasm.

Recent evaluations of 28 zoysiagrass genotypes demonstrated significant variation among genotypes, seed treatments, and days after planting (Table 1).

Table 1. Model Summary for the Zoysiagrass Seedling Emergence Trial.

Table 1A. Fixed Effects.
Source of variationdf
Genotype (Geno)27χ²P-value
Treatment (Treat)2191.835< 0.0001
DAP11196.814< 0.0001
Geno x Treat54833.833< 0.0001
Geno x DAP297513.810< 0.0001
Treat x DAP22676.566< 0.0001
Table 1B. Random Effects.
Random termVariance
block (intercept)0.0092SDno. of groupsno. of observations
     

Note. DAPf = days after planting (DAP) modeled as a categorical factor in the discrete-time emergence model. Evaluation days were 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, and 77 DAP.

Joint tests in panel A were obtained from the selected final model, BB2, a beta-binomial generalized linear mixed model with genotype, treatment, DAPf, and their two-way interactions as fixed effects. Panel B reports the random-effect variance component for block from the corresponding selected model.

Time to 50% emergence (T50) varied substantially among genotypes and seed treatments (Figure 1). Several experimental entries reached 50% emergence substantially earlier than commercial standards, indicating useful genetic variation for establishment-related traits.

charts of time to 50% Zoysiagrass seedling emergence based on different treatments as described in the accompanying text
Figure 1. Predicted Time to 50% Cumulative Seedling Emergence (T50) for Zoysiagrass Entries. This is under Control (Panel A) NaOH (0.5% for 12 hr; Panel B) and KOH (20% for 30 min; Panel C) seed treatments. Shaded bars indicate genotypes that reached 50% emergence by the final observation date, whereas empty bars extend to 77 days after planting (DAP) and indicate genotypes that did not reach 50% emergence by the final observation date. Error bars represent 95% confidence limits.

Heatmap analyses further demonstrated cumulative emergence advantages relative to the commercial cultivar ‘Zenith’ (Figure 2), while cumulative emergence curves identified breeding lines with rapid and sustained emergence throughout the evaluation period (Figure 3).

Three seedling emergence heatmaps under different conditions, with the darkest overall shading on the control, and the overall lightest shading on the panel for 20% KOH for 30 min. Darker shading indicates greater cumulative emergence advantages relative to ‘Zenith’, while lighter shading indicates lower advantages.
Figure 2. Heatmaps Showing Cumulative Seedling Emergence Advantage of Zoysiagrass Germplasm. This is relative to cultivar ‘Zenith’ under control (Panel A), KOH (Panel B), and NaOH (Panel C) treatments. Darker shading indicates greater cumulative emergence advantages relative to ‘Zenith’, while lighter shading indicates lower advantages. Numbers inside heatmap cells represent the odds ratio of seedling emergence for each genotype relative to ‘Zenith’ (Sidak-adjusted P < 0.05). Odds ratio values greater than 1 indicate higher emergence odds than ‘Zenith’, whereas values less than 1 indicate lower emergence odds.
Three charts of seedling emergence show the same trend, which is a steep incline from days 7-14 with a gently upward curve following day 14.
Figure 3. Predicted Cumulative Seedling Emergence of the Five Fastest Zoysiagrass Entries, Based on Time to 50% Emergence, Compared With the Commercial Check Cultivar ‘Zenith’ Under Control (Panel A), KOH (Panel B), And NaOH (Panel C) Seed Treatments. Lines represent model-predicted cumulative emergence over time. The shaded band represents the 95% confidence interval for ‘Zenith’. The experimental entries are shown without confidence bands to improve readability in grayscale presentation.

Several experimental entries emerged earlier and maintained substantially higher cumulative emergence than ‘Zenith’, suggesting that useful sources of reduced dormancy and improved emergence potential exist within current breeding populations.

Germplasm exhibiting rapid emergence and superior establishment characteristics is currently being incorporated into crossing programs aimed at combining improved establishment with desirable turf quality, seed yield, harvestability, and environmental adaptation.

These efforts are expected to accelerate the development of commercially viable seeded zoysiagrass cultivars capable of expanding the use of zoysiagrass across a broad range of turfgrass applications.

Bermudagrass

The UGA bermudagrass breeding program continues a long history of cultivar development for golf courses, sports fields, and landscape applications. Recent breeding successes have demonstrated the value of developing cultivars with improved stress tolerance while maintaining excellent turf quality and broad environmental adaptation. One notable example is ‘TifTuf’, released by UGA in 2014 and widely recognized for exceptional drought tolerance.

The analysis compares trait performance among two new-generation bermudagrass cultivars, ‘Tahoma 31’ and ‘TifTuf’, and the industry-standard cultivar ‘Tifway’, all of which are commercially important hybrid cultivars. ‘Tahoma 31’ (OKC 1131), released by Oklahoma State University in 2019, is widely recognized for exceptional cold tolerance, while ‘TifTuf’ (DT-1) is widely recognized for exceptional drought tolerance. ‘Tifway’ (Tifway 419), released in 1960, was included as an industry-standard check cultivar.

Data were compiled from National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) trials and USDA Specialty Crop Research Initiative (SCRI) projects conducted across multiple environments throughout the United States. Trial coverage, including the number of locations and measurements by trial, trait, and cultivar, is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Number of Locations and Measurements Used to Evaluate Cultivars Across NTEP and SCRI Turfgrass Trials.
TrialaTraitbNumber of LocationscNumber of Measurementsc
‘Tahoma 31’‘TifTuf’‘Tifway’‘Tahoma 31’‘TifTuf’‘Tifway’
NTEP 2013–2017Spring Greenup181818454545
Turf Quality (TQ)181818428428428
TQ Under Drought222434343
Fall Color171717656565
NTEP 2019–2023Spring Greenup202020414141
Turf Quality202020423423423
TQ Under Drought222757575
TQ Under Shade111272727
Fall Color161616484848
SCRI 2010–2015Spring Greenupna55na1212
Turf Qualityna88na9595
TQ Under Droughtna88na6161
Fall Colorna22na22
SCRI 2011–2012      Spring Greenup11na11na
Turf Quality55na2424na
TQ Under Drought44na66na
Fall Color22na22na
SCRI 2016–2019      Spring Greenupna55na1717
Turf Qualityna55na236236
TQ Under Droughtna55na184184
Fall Colorna33na77
SCRI 2019–2023        Spring Greenup888363636
Turf Quality888113113113
TQ Under Drought888104104104
PGC Under Drought666117117117
Fall Color777232323
NTEP = National Turfgrass Evaluation Program; SCRI = Specialty Crop Research Initiative, a USDA-funded grant program. Trial years indicate the evaluation periods.
PGC Under Drought = percent green cover under drought.
Number of locations and number of measurements are reported separately for each cultivar and trait; na indicates that the cultivar was not represented in that trial comparison.

Weighted-mean frequencies with which each cultivar was classified in the top-performing statistical group are presented in Figure 4. Using a 10-percentage-point threshold to describe practical differences, ‘TifTuf’ was comparable to ‘Tahoma 31’ for spring green-up, turf quality, and turf quality under shade.

However, ‘TifTuf’ exhibited substantial advantages for drought-related traits and fall color retention, exceeding ‘Tahoma 31’ by 41 percentage points for turf quality under drought, 58 percentage points for percent green cover under drought, and 47 percentage points for fall color.

Two charts show that TifTuf outperformed both Tahoma 31 and Tifway across all traits.
Figure 4. Weighted-Mean Performance of Cultivars for Key Turfgrass Traits. The charts show the weighted-mean frequency with which each cultivar was classified in the top-performing statistical group across NTEP and SCRI turfgrass evaluation trials. NTEP data include the 2013–2017 and 2019–2023 trial cycles, while SCRI data include the trial years available for each cultivar comparison: 2011–2012 and 2019–2023 for the ‘Tahoma 31’ vs. ‘TifTuf’ comparison (top chart), and 2010–2015, 2016–2019, and 20192023 for the ‘Tifway’ vs. ‘TifTuf’ comparison (bottom chart). Traits include spring greenup, turf quality (TQ), TQ under drought, percent green cover (PGC) under drought, TQ under shade, and fall color. Values are expressed as percentages.

Compared with the industry-standard cultivar ‘Tifway’, ‘TifTuf’ demonstrated higher weighted-mean frequencies for all evaluated traits, including spring green-up, turf quality, turf quality under drought, percent green cover under drought, turf quality under shade, and fall color. Overall, ‘TifTuf’ showed the clearest advantage over both comparison cultivars for drought-related traits while maintaining performance comparable to ‘Tahoma 31’ for spring green-up, overall turf quality, and shade response.

Current breeding efforts continue to build upon these successes through the evaluation of advanced experimental germplasm and commercially available standards. Newly established evaluation trials provide opportunities to identify superior selections with improved turf quality, density, color, drought tolerance, and adaptation across diverse management environments.

Complementary breeding efforts in centipedegrass focus on developing improved cultivars for low-input turf systems throughout the southeastern U.S. Emphasis is placed on improving turf quality, persistence, and adaptation while maintaining the desirable management characteristics that have made centipedegrass an important species for residential and commercial landscapes.

Cool-Season Turfgrasses

The cool-season turfgrass breeding and evaluation program focuses on developing cultivars capable of maintaining acceptable performance under the heat, drought, and disease pressures characteristic of the transition zone. Research activities include breeding progeny evaluations, advanced variety trials, and disease-screening nurseries in tall fescue, perennial ryegrass, Kentucky bluegrass, and fine fescues.

Tall fescue breeding efforts emphasize the development of cultivars with improved summer performance, persistence, turf quality, and resistance to major diseases including gray leaf spot and brown patch. Current evaluations include a breeding progeny nursery established in fall 2025, advanced variety trials containing commercial cultivars and UGA experimental germplasm established in October 2025, and gray leaf spot disease screening trials containing commercial and near-commercial entries. These trials are evaluated for establishment, turf quality, persistence, summer stress performance, disease resistance, and overall adaptation under southeastern growing conditions. Emphasis is placed on identifying germplasm with improved resistance to gray leaf spot and brown patch while maintaining the turf quality and persistence required for transition-zone environments.

Additional cool-season research includes replicated evaluations of perennial ryegrass, Kentucky bluegrass, and fine fescues established in October 2025. These trials contain commercial standards and advanced experimental germplasm and are evaluated for establishment rate, genetic color, turf quality, disease resistance, and adaptation to environmental stresses. Major diseases under evaluation include brown patch and dollar spot in perennial ryegrass; summer patch, dollar spot, and rust diseases in Kentucky bluegrass; and dollar spot in fine fescues.

Collectively, these evaluations provide critical information for identifying superior germplasm and advancing breeding populations adapted to the environmental challenges of the southeastern U.S.

High-Throughput Phenotyping and Future Directions

Advanced phenotyping technologies are increasingly integrated throughout the UGA turfgrass breeding program to improve the efficiency and precision of selection decisions. Unmanned aerial systems equipped with RGB, thermal, multispectral, and hyperspectral sensors are routinely deployed throughout the growing season to collect objective measurements of turfgrass performance across breeding nurseries and evaluation trials. These technologies provide high-resolution data for traits including establishment, turf quality, canopy temperature, drought response, heat tolerance, and disease resistance.

The integration of high-throughput phenotyping with traditional breeding approaches provides new opportunities to increase evaluation capacity, improve selection efficiency, and accelerate genetic gain. Future breeding efforts will continue to emphasize the development of climate-resilient turfgrass cultivars capable of maintaining high-quality performance under increasingly challenging environmental conditions while providing sustainable solutions for the turfgrass industry.


Published by University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. For more information or guidance, contact your local Extension office.

The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (working cooperatively with Fort Valley State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the counties of Georgia) offers its educational programs, assistance, and materials to all people without regard to age, color, disability, genetic information, national origin, race, religion, sex, or veteran status, and is an Equal Opportunity Institution.

Share

What is a Annual Publication?

An annual Extension publication provides timely, research-based information that is updated annually, such as spray guides for commercial fruit growers, or reports about UGA research trials on turfgrass, vegetables, and more.

Written and Reviewed by Experts

This resource was written and reviewed by experts. Click below for more information on how we produce science you can trust.