This resource was written and reviewed by experts. Learn more about how we produce science you can trust.
a creative red and black duotone image of onions

UGA Extension contacts:
Jason Lessl, Daniel L. Jackson, Christopher Todd Tyson, Jason D. Edenfield, Derrick Bowen, Aubrey Shirley, Anthony G. Bateman, Denny R. Thigpen, Steven Powell, Savannah Tanner, Shane Curry, Lauren Stanley, and Ross Greene

Each season the UGA, Agricultural and Environmental Services Laboratories (AESL) evaluates the flavor-associated compounds in the short-day onions grown in the variety trial. These onion varieties are submitted by the participating seed companies, grown at the Vidalia Onion and Vegetable Research Center, and once harvested and dried, are submitted to the AESL for analysis of the pungency-related compounds: pyruvic acid, lachrymatory factor (LF), and methyl thiosulfinates.

Due to the association of Vidalia onions with low pungency and sweet flavor, this annual evaluation provides useful information about the relative flavor quality of these onion varieties. Furthermore, results are used to evaluate Yellow Granex varieties before officially qualifying them to be grown as sweet Vidalia onions in the region.

This publication summarizes the flavor analysis results from the 2023–2024 growing season, as well as comparing the performance of each variety over the past three growing seasons.

Materials and Methods

There were 53 onion varieties analyzed as part of the 2023–2024 variety trial. Each variety was grown at the research center in quadruplicate plots. Harvested onions from each plot were graded, dried, and submitted to the lab individually. Cores taken from 10 onions within each replicate were composited and pressed to collect the onion juice, which was analyzed following procedures described in Kim et al. (2017).

Results and Discussion

The following tables compare the concentrations of flavor-associated compounds in onions grown as a part of the 2023–2024 variety trial. It should be noted that as the three measured parameters decrease, the onions are considered to have a superior flavor quality. In this year’s Yellow Granex variety trials, the pyruvic acid (pungency) content ranged from 2.5–6.0 µmol/ml, which is a decrease of 12% compared to the past two growing seasons. Lachrymatory factor ranged from 0.5–2.1 µmol/ml, which was a decrease of 83% compared to the last two seasons. Finally, methyl thiosulfinates ranged from 2.7–16.6 nmol/ml which was a decrease of 79% compared to the previous growing seasons.

Overall, the flavor quality of the variety trial onions was significantly improved as compared to the past two seasons. This could be attributed to the increased rainfall prior to bulb initiation, which may have leached more sulfur from the soil. This year’s data on the cumulative variety flavor quality rankings are also provided along with the average rating of Yellow Granex onion varieties grown over the past three seasons.

For additional information regarding the performance of a given variety, please contact your Extension agent or the Vidalia Onion and Vegetable Research Center. We would like to thank the participating seed companies as well as the Vidalia Onion Committee for their support of this trial.

Reference

Kim, H.-Y., Jackson, D., Adhikari, K., Riner, C., & Sanchez-Brambila, G. (2017). Relationship between consumer acceptability and pungency-related flavor compounds of Vidalia onions. Journal of Food Science, 82(10), 2396–2402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13915

Tables

Table 1. Pungency (Pyruvic Acid) Content in Onions in the 2023–2024 Variety Trial.
VarietyPyruvic ccid
µmole/g
Gilmore 262.5a
SS44023.2ab
A28013.3abc
Sweet Azalea3.7abcd
Macon3.7abcd
A28003.7abcd
SS40013.4abcd
Sweet Magnolia3.8abcd
14073.8abcd
Candy Ann3.9abcde
Red Duke3.9abcde
1014b4.0abcdef
Candy Kim4.0abcdef
Sweet Agent4.1abcdef
XON-404Y4.1abcdefg
Maragogi4.2abcdefg
Plethora4.2abcdefg
Fast Track4.3abcdefg
Torro Rosso4.3bcdefg
XON 106Y4.3bcdefg
Sapelo4.4bcdefg
AG-33104.4bcdefg
OSYF22-40224.4bcdefg
Sweet Tule4.4bcdefg
10114.5bcdefg
Red Maiden4.5bcdefg
Reformac4.5bcdefg
Candy Joy4.6bcdefg
Red Halen4.6bcdefg
Monja blanca4.6bcdefg
XON-300Y4.7bcdefg
3694.7bcdefg
Copadad4.7bcdefg
OSYF12-70914.7bcdefg
Vidora4.7bcdefg
A28494.7bcdefg
Tania4.8bcdefg
EMY 554574.8bcdefg
Early Sweet4.9bcdefg
Superex4.9bcdefg
Chianti5.0bcdefg
Georgia Boy5.0cdefg
Mata Hari5.1cdefg
Century5.2defg
OSYF10-42015.3defg
Rio Dulce5.4def
Dulciana5.5defg
Joelino5.7efg
10258e5.7efg
Rio Del Sol5.8fg
Sofire5.9g
3806.0g
Note. Similar letters between varieties indicate those varieties are not significantly different according to Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05).
b formerly 5901
c formerly EMY 55455
d formerly EMY 55126
e formerly A1298
Table 2. Onion Lachrymatory Factor (Propanethial S-Oxide) Content in Onions in the 2023–2024 Variety Trial.
VarietyLachrymatory factor
µmole/g
Gilmore 260.5a
SS4020.7ab
Fast Track0.7ab
A28010.7abc
Sweet Agent0.7abc
14070.8abcd
Red Duke0.8abcd
Tania0.9abcde
A28000.9abcde
Vidora0.9abcdef
Candy Kim0.9abcdef
Candy Ann0.9abcdef
10110.9abcdef
Candy Joy1.0abcdef
Early Sweet1.0abcdef
Red Maiden1.0abcdef
1014b1.0abcdef
SS40011.0abcdef
Maragogi1.1abcdef
OSYF12-70911.1abcdef
Macon1.1abcdef
A22901.1abcdef
OSYF10-40211.2abcdefg
A28491.2abcdefg
Superex1.2abcdefg
Dulciana1.2abcdefg
Sweet Magnolia1.3abcdefg
OSYF22-40221.3abcdefg
3691.3abcdefg
AG-33101.3abcdefg
Plethora1.3abcdefg
10258c1.3abcdefg
EMY 554571.3abcdefg
Sweet Azalea1.3abcdefg
Monja blanca1.3abcdefg
XON-404Y1.4abcdefg
Chianti1.4abcdefg
XON-300Y1.4abcdefg
Torro Rosso1.5bcdefg
Mata Hari1.5bcdefg
Sweet Tule1.5bcdefg
Red Halen1.5bcdefg
Joelino1.5bcdefg
XON 106Y1.5bcdefg
Sofire1.5bcdefg
Rio Dulce1.5cdefg
Copadad1.7defg
Reformae1.7defg
Sapelo1.8efg
Georgia Boy1.8efg
3801.8fg
Century1.8fg
Rio Del Sol2.1g
Note. Similar letters between varieties indicate those varieties are not significantly different according to Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05).
b formerly 5901
c formerly A1298
d formerly EMY 55126
e formerly EMY 55455
Table 3. Methyl Thiosulfinate Content in Onions in the 2023–2024 Variety Trial.
VarietyMethyl thiosulfinates
nmole/g
Gilmore 262.7a
A28013.2a
SS44024ab
SS40014.3ab
A28004.4av
Vidora4.4av
Georgia Boy4.8abc
A28494.8abc
EMY 554575.5abcd
Candy Kim5.5abcd
14075.7abcde
Superex5.8abcde
Sweet Azalea5.8abcde
Early Sweet5.9abcdef
A22906.3abcdef
Plethora6.4abcdef
Tania6.5abcdef
1014b7.0sbcdef
Red Duke7.0abcdef
Maragogi7.0abcdef
Red Maiden7.2abcdefg
10117.6abcdefg
Sweet Agent7.8abcdefg
Reformac7.8abcdefg
Candy Ann7.9abcdefg
Copadad8.1abcdefg
Sweet Magnolia8.1abcdefg
Candy Joy8.2abcdefg
Sweet Tule8.2abcdefg
10258e8.5abcdefg
Rio Del Sol8.6abcdefg
Red Halen8.9abcdefg
Dulciana8.9abcdefg
Rio Dulce8.9abcdefg
3699.1abcdefg
AG-33109.2abcdefg
Torro Rosso9.2abcdefg
Century9.7abcdefg
Fast Track9.8abcdefg
Mata Hari10.4abcdefg
Chianti10.9abcdefg
Sapelo11.9abcdefg
XON-300Y11.9abcdefg
Monja blanca12.0abcdefg
Macon13.0bcdefg
Sofire13.3bcdefg
38013.5bcdefg
Joelino14.3cdefg
OSYF10-420114.9defg
XON 106Y15.2efg
XON-404Y15.4fg
OSYF22-402215.4fg
OSYF12-709116.6g
Note. Similar letters between varieties indicate those varieties are not significantly different according to Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05).
b formerly 5901
c formerly EMY 55455
d formerly EMY 55126
e formerly A1298
Table 4. Overall Flavor Quality Ranking of the 2023–2024 Variety Trial Onions.
VarietyRank
Gilmore 261
SS4022
A28013
A28004
SS44015
14076
Red Duke7
Fast Track8 (t)
Candy Kim8 (t)
Sweet Agent8 (t)
Sweet Azalea8 (t)
Vidora8 (t)
A229013
Macon14 (t)
Candy Ann14 (t)
A284914 (t)
1014b14 (t)
Sweet Magnolia14 (t)
EMY 5545719 (t)
Maragogi19 (t)
Tania19 (t)
Early Sweet22 (t)
Superex22 (t)
Plethora22 (t)
Candy Joy25 (t)
Red Maiden25 (t)
101125 (t)
36928 (t)
Monja blanca28 (t)
XON-300Y28 (t)
AG-331028 (t)
Chianti28 (t)
Torro Rosso33 (t)
Sweet Tule33 (t)
Red Halen33 (t)
Georgia Boy33 (t)
Dulciana37 (t)
Mata Hari37 (t)
10258c39 (t)
Copadad39 (t)
Reformae39 (t)
XON-404Y42 (t)
Sapelo42 (t)
Rio Dulce42 (t)
OSYF22-402245 (t)
OSYF12-709145 (t)
OSYF10-402145 (t)
XON 106Y45 (t)
Joelino49
Sofire50 (t)
Century50 (t)
Rio Del Sol50 (t)
38053
Ranked on lowest pyruvic acid, lachrymatory factor, and methyl thiosulfinates.
b formerly 5901
c formerly A1298
d formerly EMY 55126
e formerly EMY 55455
(t) tied
Table 5. Overall Flavor Quality Ranking of Yellow Variety Trial Onions Harvested in 2022–2024.
VarietyRank
Candy Kim1 (t)
Maragogi1 (t)
Tania3
Emy 554574 (t)
Plethora4 (t)
Sweet Azalea4 (t)
Reformaa5 (t)
Sweet Agent5 (t)
Vidora9 (t)
Sweet Magnola9 (t)
Superex9 (t)
Macon9 (t)
Fast Track9 (t)
Georgia Boy14 (t)
Copadab14 (t)
Candy Ann16 (t)
Sapelo16 (t)
Century18 (t)
EMY 5545718 (t)
Candy Joy20
Ranked in order of lowest overall pyruvic acid, lachrymatory factor, and methyl thiosulfinates. Only Yellow Granex varieties were included in the table.
a formerly EMY 55455
b formerly EMY 55126


Published by University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. For more information or guidance, contact your local Extension office.

The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (working cooperatively with Fort Valley State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the counties of Georgia) offers its educational programs, assistance, and materials to all people without regard to age, color, disability, genetic information, national origin, race, religion, sex, or veteran status, and is an Equal Opportunity Institution.

Share

What is a Annual Publication?

An annual Extension publication provides timely, research-based information that is updated annually, such as spray guides for commercial fruit growers, or reports about UGA research trials on turfgrass, vegetables, and more.

Written and Reviewed by Experts

This resource was written and reviewed by experts. Click below for more information on how we produce science you can trust.